x
M & H
Home

Psychological expertise in criminal cases involving sexual abuse

Abstract Psychological expertise in criminal cases regarding sexual abuse represents a crucial aspect in ensuring fair justice and understanding traumatic events correctly. This article refers to the importance of understanding theories that will provide the necessary basis for the adequate assessment of obtained information. Keywords: sexual abuse, psychological expertise, projective tests

Psychological expertise in criminal cases involving sexual abuse: from theory to practice HAMBEȚIU Anamaria, Dr. STANCIU Camelia, Dr. DELCEA Cristian.

Theoretical Aspects

Conducting psychological expertise is a link that ensures establishing the circumstances of legal importance with objective content, based on which a correct qualification of the legal event can be made, thus respecting the subject's rights. In modern judicial systems, judicial psychological expertise is a necessity that can adjust and advise analytically what in today's legal literature we call the judge's intimate conviction or the magistrate's conscience. Global evolution and the need to use scientific tools and experts in specialized fields, in situations of rigorous and experienced approach, supplemented by certification of competencies, can lead to a modern, transparent, and flexible act of justice. N. Mitrofan gives the following definition of the notion: "psychological expertise is a complex set of actions of analysis, investigation, and psychological measurement of the human individual, aiming to highlight the specific characteristics of their psychometric profile."

Currently, one of the dramatic problems of contemporary society is the increase in juvenile crime, as well as the number of minor victims (Luca, 2014). The participation of the child in the criminal process presupposes a series of roles in which they can find themselves, rights and obligations that may incumbent upon them, one of the most important aspects referring to the expertise of the child victim of a crime (Luca, 2014). Although of major importance for the subsequent course of the criminal process, the expertise of the minor victim of a crime is not expressly regulated by procedural penal norms. However, there are relevant aspects that differentiate the victim from the perpetrator, and moreover, the adult from the minor.
Abuse involves the engagement of a child or adolescent minor, dependent and immature from the perspective of psychosexual development, in sexual activities they are unable to understand, which are inappropriate for their age or psychosexual development, sexual activities they undergo being constrained by violence or seduction or any that transgress social taboos related to family roles; these activities usually involve physical contact, with or without sexual penetration. Sexual molestation, exposing the child to insults or language with sexual connotations, touching the child in erogenous zones with the hand or by kissing, regardless of the child's age; situations that lead to the satisfaction of the sexual needs of an adult or another child who is in a position of responsibility, power, or in a relationship of trust with the child victim; enticing or forcing the child into obscene actions; exposing the child to obscene materials or providing such materials to them; early marriage or engagement of children involving sexual relations (especially in Roma communities); genital mutilation; sexual harassment, defined for the workplace, for children working in the formal system under Law no. 53/2003 - Labor Code, with subsequent amendments and completions, referred to hereinafter as the Labor Code, or under the Civil Code. In the penal casuistry regarding crimes committed against minors, victims of abuse or mistreatment include "all forms of physical and/or emotional mistreatment, sexual abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, commercial or other exploitation, trafficking, whose consequences are actual or potential damage to the child's health, survival, development, or dignity, in the context of a relationship of responsibility, trust, or power."
Close collaboration between professionals in the legal and psychological fields is essential to ensure that the needs of sexually abused children are understood and addressed in a holistic and efficient manner. The principles enshrined by the Consultative Council of European Prosecutors in the Yerevan Declaration on Justice for Minors, drafted on the occasion of the 2010 Plenary Session, stipulate that all magistrates involved in justice for minors should "take into account the degree of maturity, vulnerability, and mental capacity of the minor, regardless of their procedural quality in relation to criminal law, as perpetrator, victim, or witness."
Psychological expertise is ordered ex officio or at the request of the criminal prosecution body / court / extrajudicial evidence on the legal basis of Article 172 of Title IV ("Evidence, means of evidence, and probative procedures") of the Code of Criminal Procedure: "for the establishment, clarification, or evaluation of facts or circumstances that are important for the discovery of the truth in the case, the opinion of an expert is necessary."
On behalf of the judicial body, difficulties are identified in the appreciation/ interpretation of the evidence, respectively the psychological evaluations (initial/detailed, comprehensive, and multidimensional, prepared by social workers/psychologists from the DGASPC) or judicial or extrajudicial psychological expertise. In the context of investigations and legal proceedings concerning such cases, psychological expertise is essential to understand and evaluate the psychological impact of abuse on the victim, to explain/justify the victim's reactions/attitude during or after the abuse, to contribute to obtaining fair justice, and to facilitate the recovery process of the victims. Psychologists can provide expertise in court, helping judges and lawyers interpret the information provided by minors during the investigation and trial, to understand the victim's ability to perceive the true dimension of the situation that transformed them in a victim, to interpret her reactions during or after the occurrence of the abuse, in relation to her mental development, to discern whether it is simulated behaviour or not regarding what she claims happened to her, and for clarification of the facts, the existence, and nature of the abuse.
In cases involving crimes of rape, sexual assault, sexual acts with a minor, mistreatment of a minor, all crimes that have a major impact on the psyche and development of the child, psychological expertise (in some cases even psychiatric, when there are indications of mental alienation) may be indispensable for the magistrate seeking to establish: either the existence of the act itself (as in the case of the offense of mistreatment of a minor, whose objective aspect requires proving "serious endangerment through measures or treatments of any kind, physical, intellectual or moral development of the minor...", or rape/sexual assault, which requires establishing the existence of sexual abuse/aggression), or clarifying the quality of the victim's consent in relation to their mental and biological age (sexual act with a minor).

Judicial authorities may request psychological expertise in cases of sexual abuse of minors to assess trauma, as sexual abuse has a significant impact on the mental and emotional health of a minor, the credibility of the minor witness, their ability to testify validly, and provide relevant information for the case. Additionally, psychological expertise can examine the degree of suggestibility of a minor and can help discern between real information and possible influences or distortions of memory and provides important information for making recommendations for therapeutic interventions or support services that may be necessary for the child following the experience of sexual abuse.

  • Case
    The minor T.M., aged 7 years and 10 months, is a first grade student. He is currently
    integrated in a Social Facility in Reghin.
    Objectives:
     assessment of the minor in terms of cognitive development;
     evaluation of the minor in terms of the existence/non-existence of internalizing and
    externalizing problems: anxiety, depression, loneliness, somatic accusations, social
    relationship problems, thinking problems, attention problems, hyperactivity,
    impulsivity, rule-breaking behavior, aggressive behavior;
     description of the minor’s personality structure;
     identifying the elements of alleged sexual abuse (apart from the minor’s statements);
     the existence of sexual problems;
    The assessment tools used were: Raven Standard Progressive Matrices (J. Raven, J.C.
    Raven, J.H. Court, 2003, Romanian Psychological Testing Services), ASEBA (The
    Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment), Romanian Psychological Testing
    Services), Tree Test, K. Koch, 2015, Ed. Sinapsis, Testul Desenul familiei, C. Jourdan-
    Ionescu, J. Lahance, 2006, Ed. Profex, T.A.C. (Thematic Apperception Test for Children), L.
    Bellak, 2015, Ed. Sinapsis, Ant Story Test, Checklist for Child Abuse Evaluation, J. Petty,
    D&D Consultants Grup.
    Interpretation of the results: The minor is at the level of average intelligence, an aspect
    that supports the possibility of understanding the situations he is going through. The minor
    integrates into the normal range in terms of anxiety, depression, loneliness, somatic
    accusations, social relationship problems, thinking problems, attention problems,
    hyperactivity, impulsivity, rule-breaking behavior and aggressive behavior.
    He has an extroverted personality, shows stubbornness, sensitivity, receptivity,
    practical tendencies, impressionability, influenceability, impatience, valuing his own person,
    curiosity and interest in everything around him. Maternal fixation, the existence of recent/old
    emotional conflicts, adjustment difficulties, emotional lability, permanently attached,
    constancy in relationships. The existence of a sexual difficulty and the fear of castration.
    Overinvestment of the oral sphere. The child has no regressive references related to
    corporeality, being able to differentiate his own body image cognitively. Sensory reference is
    related to touch. Body touches are perceived as unpleasant. Existence of rejection affects
    towards family members and aggressive tendencies. The omission of family members
    indicates the hiding of an unacceptable and painful reality. The child feels a lack of safety in
    social contacts. There are a number of elements that indicate the presence of a psychosomatic
    disorder (enuresis). The existence of a defensive process against the father figure was noted.
    He fears being left alone and feels abandoned by his parents (especially his mother).
    Interviewing the child regarding sexual abuse: the boy recounts an episode in which, being in the care of “Ionuț” (the mother’s concubine), “he took out his …. (indicates the man’s genital
    organ) and wanted to fool with me one night I was in bed with him, and my sisters were in
    another bed, in the same room.” When asked how many times this episode was repeated, the
    child states that it happened only once. Description of the scene: “He touched me on the
    mouth with … (indicates the man’s genital organ). Asked if he smelled anything, the answer is
    negative; asked if he felt any taste after oral contact, the answer was “skin taste”. Do not make
    statements about adult kissing/stroking/licking/sucking on any part of the body. He reports the
    presence of similar abuses at the age of 6 “by some boys, at a cabin”.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Butoi, T. (2012). University course in forensic psychology: theoretical and practical approaches. Trei Publishing House, Bucharest
2. Luca, C. (2014). Psychological expertise of the abused/neglected child, Ed. Hamangiu, Bucharest
3. Luca, C., Pivniceru, M.M. (2016). The best interest of the child. Psychological expertise in case of parental separation/divorce, Ed. Hamangiu, Bucharest
4. Mitrofan, N, Zdrenghea, V., & Butoi. T. (1992). Legal psychology. Şansa Publishing House and Press, Bucharest. 1992.
5. Mitrofan, N. Zdrenghea, V. & Butoi, T. (2000). Legal psychology. Bucharest
6. LAW No. 272/2004 of June 21, 2004 *** Republished on the protection and promotion of children’s rights
7. DECISION no. 49 of January 19, 2011 for the approval of the Framework Methodology on the prevention and intervention in multidisciplinary teams and in the network in situations of violence against children and family violence and the Methodology of multidisciplinary and inter-institutional intervention regarding exploited children and at risk of exploitation through work, children victims of human trafficking, as well as Romanian migrant children victims of other forms of violence on the territory of other states
8. https://www.csm1909.ro/ViewFile.ashx?guid=fbd4ad97-b887-4474-ae7c-327031bf12e1-InfoCSM
9. https://lege5.ro/Gratuit/geztmnjtgy4tk/hotararea-in-cauza-aej-impotriva-romaniei-din-30082022

Leave a Comment